CONTACT US   SUBSCRIBE   PREMIUM   ADVERTISING

79F Hi 79F
Lo 68F

Recent Blog Posts

Oh No, Not a Nonbinding Resolution ...

by Daniel Freedman
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 at 12:14 PM

updated Mon, 12 Feb 2007 at 9:14 PM

Print Send RSS Share:    

"House Democratic leaders circulated a nonbinding resolution Monday saying that Congress 'disapproves of the decision of President George W. Bush ... to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq,'" the AP reports.

The measure, expected to come to a vote by Friday, also says that "Congress and the American people will continue to support and protect the members of the United States armed forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq."
Why only a nonbinding resolution? If the Democrats really want to stop the war they can cut funds. Congress does have the power of the purse.

The Democrats want to pass this resolution to appease their anti-war base, but they don't actually want to pass a real resolution -- knowing that it will cause them more damage in the long-term.

Passing an anti-war resolution means the Democrats will be remembered as the party who tried to stop the President and his generals and his troops from achieving their mission. If the American troops succeed anyway, it will be despite the Democrats. And if the troops fail, it'll because the Democrats tried to kneecap them.

And so the Democrats come up with a nonbinding resolution. But this resolution also has consquences. It damages the moral of the troops and encourages our enemies (endangering the troops more). This nonbinding resolution sends a signal that Congress isn't behind our troops.

This attempt by the Democrats to have their cake and eat it won't work.

Update: Tom Elliot adds his bit on the Democrat's rhetoric, and provides a great quote from Orwell:

In their rush to denounce the commander-in-chief's leadership, Democrats inescapably aid al Qaeda in Iraq and its cohorts. Like those before them, George Orwell said of the Brits advocating withdrawal from World War II: "This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other side."

It Shines For All Homepage

Berkshire Lifestyle
A New York Sun Advertorial Section

NEW YORK ›

Spitzer Staff May Have Broken Law in Bruno Probe

Council Members Push Pedal To Add Taxi Fuel Surcharge

Paterson's Tax Cap Plan May End Up Costing City

Shooter of Two in East Village Surrenders to Police

Port Authority Nears Deal With Church at Ground Zero

MTA Board Members Asking Albany for Help

NATIONAL ›

Obama Calls for Joint Approach to Terror at Berlin

Schumer Scolded Over Politics At Economic Hearing

Hurricane Dolly Weakens, Spares Levees

Weather Forces McCain to Cancel Event on Oil Rig Off Gulf Coast

Test Offers Hope in Combatting Cholesterol Drug Side Effects

Obama Plans Olympic Ad Buy

ARTS+ ›

Before, During & After the Fall: Dürer at MOBIA

Chaos and Danger in Architectural Design

Nameless, Homeless, Borderline Soulless: Ralph Fiennes Does Beckett

Up for Bid at Scope Hamptons: Collector Mentorship

A Victorian Neighborhood Remade

Dream Weavers Captured in Print